Five independent minds — each with a distinct analytical lens, drawn from the 20+ most powerful AI systems in the world — analyze simultaneously, then debate, challenge, and converge. You see every disagreement. You decide.
MyPilot is not a product alongside Le Corum. It's the conversational layer that makes Le Corum accessible — your guide through every deliberation, from first question to final verdict. It speaks. Le Corum thinks.
"What's the real decision here?" — MyPilot asks the clarifying questions before anything launches. It identifies what you're actually deciding, not just what you typed.
MyPilot will never recommend a 5-credit deliberation if 1.2 credits answer your question. It suggests the mode that fits your need — not the one that maximizes your bill. But if you want The Dream Team, it executes without question.
When Le Corum delivers its synthesis, MyPilot walks you through it — confidence score, minority positions, conditions that could invalidate the recommendation. Nothing is left unexplained.
Le Corum doesn't debate for the sake of debate. It confronts five independent perspectives to converge on one structured verdict. You observe in real time — read-only, unfiltered. The disagreements are the signal. The synthesis is the product.
Ask your question to MyPilot. It prepares the ground, clarifies the decision, and recommends the right level of analysis. No form — just a conversation.
Five minds analyze independently, then confront each other across multiple rounds. They challenge the emerging consensus. You observe in real time.
During deliberation, MyPilot translates what's happening, alerts you on important disagreements, and gives you the floor when it matters.
Le Corum delivers its recommendation with its confidence level, maintained dissents, and conditions that could invalidate it. The decision remains yours.
Benchmarks, financial rigour, process optimization. Never lets emotion obscure the numbers.
Macro forces, long-context synthesis, competitive positioning. Sees around corners.
Math, code accuracy, feasibility. Exposes what sounds good but breaks in practice.
Nuanced risk, ethical implications, second-order effects. The voice that says "but what if."
Sovereign perspective, contrarian evidence, blind spots. Challenges what everyone else agrees on.
Before every deliberation, five source layers run in parallel — in under 500ms. Each persona receives only what's relevant to its analytical lens. Every claim is labelled: verified, estimated, or inferred.
Built as an MCP server, MyCorum.ai plugs natively into any MCP-compatible AI client. No copy-pasting. No context switching. Launch a deliberation, track its rounds, extract the structured action plan — all without leaving your workflow.
Connect any MCP-compatible server as a knowledge source — proprietary databases, internal tools, specialized search systems. Browse the public MCP Registry directly from MyCorum.ai.
You never re-enter context the same way twice. Tool 2 is answering a subtly different question than Tool 1 — shaped by the answer you just read. You're comparing apples with informed apples.
The answer you read last carries disproportionate weight in your synthesis — regardless of quality. Tab 1 starts to fade as you work through Tabs 3, 4, and 5.
When three tools agree, the instinct is to accept the consensus. But three tools trained on overlapping data sharing a blind spot looks exactly like three tools agreeing on the truth.
You end up as confident as the most confident individual answer — without any mechanism to know if that confidence is warranted. Certainty without calibration is a blind spot.
The professional who opens three AI tools before acting has the right instinct. The problem is the execution — three contexts re-entered, three answers compared by hand, one synthesis call made by someone trying to remember what Tab 1 said while reading Tab 3. Express routes your question to the model that benchmarks highest on your specific task type — legal, financial, technical, strategic. Automatically. You see why. You override if you disagree.
Smart Routing · One input. The right mind. Your control.Manual synthesis across multiple tools reintroduces exactly the bias multi-model analysis was supposed to prevent — you weight the answer closest to your existing view, and quietly set aside the one that challenged it. Le Corum replaces five tabs, five context re-entries, and the synthesis judgment call you were making anyway — with a structured protocol: independent analysis, cross-critique, convergence. One output. Calibrated confidence. The minority view preserved.
Multi-Mind Deliberation · Not five answers. One verdict.No subscription required to start. Buy credits when you need them. Upgrade when it makes sense.